Cases 1 - 10 of 317
Medrano Saenz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3200
Petitioner:
YENY ARELY MEDRANO SAENZ and ZACHARY JOSHUA ARGUETA MEDRANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Cano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3211
Petitioner:
ANA LETICIA RAMOS CANO, ARELI HERRERA RAMOS and JUAN HERRERA RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Said Marji v. ARS National Services Inc
as 5:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Said Marji
Defendant:
ARS National Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ayala-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2699
Petitioner:
JESUS ALBERTO AYALA-RODRIGUEZ, INGRID ARELY LAINEZ-DE AYALA, ALEXI ARNOLDO AYALA-LAINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores Segura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2513
Petitioner:
ERIC FRANK FLORES SEGURA, JOHANA ALEXANDRA VIGNOLO ESPINOZA, ARELY MARIANA FLORES VIGNOLO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Arely Buendia Perez
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Richard Timmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez Cisneros, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
DANIELA LOPEZ CISNEROS and YESSICA ARELY ARAIZA LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estrada-Hurtado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-702
Petitioner:
EDWIN TOMAS ESTRADA-HURTADO, DELMY ARELY TORRES-DE ESTRADA, CAMILA ALEXANDRA ESTRADA-TORRES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Doe v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC, Ramada Worldwide Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Reznick, et al. v. United States Trustee, et al.
as 23-3543
Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE REZNICK
Appellee:
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Los Angeles and YVETTE HARGROVE-BROWN
Debtor / Appellee:
DA & AR HOSPICE CARE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
