Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,850
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant: SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others
Callioux v. Strange et al
as 2:2024cv00687
Petitioner: Mr. Robert R.D. Callioux
Respondent: Secretary Cheryl Strange and Superintendent Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ziegler v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05381
Petitioner: Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02944
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-3119
Petitioner: DAVID BENNETT
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: MONROE DETENTION CENTER, YOLO COUNTY JAIL, WELL PATH DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02945
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bennett v. Parales et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01367
Plaintiff: Mario Bennett
Defendant: Parales and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bennett v. Parales et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00591
Plaintiff: Mario Bennett
Defendant: Parales and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Bennett
as 24-3009
Petitioner: CECIL L. MORTON
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Butsch v. Bennett
as 24-3017
Petitioner: CLAYTON E. BUTSCH
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?