Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00535
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Reed v. Nelson et al
as 1:2020cv00330
Defendant:
T. R. Kauffman, Rick M. Hill and C. Nelson
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Reed v. Nelson et al
as 2:2020cv00512
Defendant:
T. R. Kauffman, Rick M. Hill and C. Nelson
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv02135
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Nelson and Patricia C. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Nelson et al v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv03100
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Nelson and Vanessa Nelson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
Marcos Munoz v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04345
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, C. Estrada, C. Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Daniel Nelson v. Carrie Belden
as 19-35258
Respondent / Appellee:
CARRIE BELDEN, Exec. Director Alaska Parole Board
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL C. NELSON
Bredberg v. Callender et al
as 3:2019cv05152
Defendant:
Hugh Mortensen, Paul Anderson, Siri C Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
AJ Bredberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marcos Munoz v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv10264
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Los Angeles County Sheriff Department, C. Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
