Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff: Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant: CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff: Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pizarro et al v. Astra Flooring Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08427
Defendant: York International Corp., individually and as successor in interest to Lillard Co. and Lilco, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., National Steel and Shipbuilding Company and others
Plaintiff: Renato C Pizarro, Mercedita D Pizarro and Mercedita D. Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harris et al v. CBS Corporation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv07572
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of Delaval Steam Turbine Co. and others
Plaintiff: Elsie Harris and Michael Roy Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sanchez et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv03704
Defendant: Owens-Illinois, Inc., Crane Co., Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Plaintiff: David Sanchez, Delight Sanchez, Dion Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
v. Designated Defense Counsel et al
as 4:2017cv05444
Defendant: Designated Defense Counsel, Allied Fluid Products Corp. FKA Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., American President Lines, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Foster Wheeler LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01618
Plaintiff: Bobbie E. Thomas
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Allied Packing & Supply Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sanders et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2012cv03394
Plaintiff: Lanny Sanders , Sandra Jensen Sanders , CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Defendant: 3M Company, Crane Co. , Fraser's Boiler Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Salisbury v. Asbestos Corporation Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv03260
Plaintiff: Jerry Salisbury and CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Defendant: Asbestos Corporation Limited, Huntington Ingalls Incorporated and Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?