Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
City of Buffalo, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., et al.
as 24-2350
Plaintiff: CITY OF CINCINNATI, CITY OF CLEVELAND, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Defendant: HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. and KIA MOTOR AMERICA, INC
City of Buffalo, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., et al.
as 24-739
Respondent: CITY OF BUFFALO, CITY OF CINCINNATI, CITY OF CLEVELAND and others
Petitioner: HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. and KIA MOTOR AMERICA, INC
Ardalan v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2022cv03811
Plaintiff: Khosrow Ardalan, SEB Investment Management AB and West Palm Beach Firefighters Pension Fund
Defendant: Wells Fargo & Company, Charles W. Scharf, Michael P. Santomassimo and others
Petitioner: Dean Sienna, Fire and Police Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore, Employees Retirement System of Rhode Island and others
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner: LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff: American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae: New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor: CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner: CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
American Public Power Assoc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70339
Petitioner: AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor: CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Eugene, Oregon, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70344
Intervenor: CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Petitioner: CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA, CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON and CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?