Cases 1 - 10 of 806
Andrich v. Glynn, et al.
as 24-3078
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Defendant:
COURTNEY R. GLYNN, in her individual, official and supervisory capacities, BRAD K. KEOUGH, in his individual, supervisory and official capacities, DAVID SHINN, in his official capacity and others
Mitchener v. A.D.T. Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv02721
Plaintiff:
Courtney Mitchener
Defendant:
A.D.T. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Courtney Linker v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Courtney Linker
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
D'allo v. Modrijan et al
as 3:2024cv05325
Plaintiff:
Timjae A D'allo
Defendant:
Stephanie Modrijan, Vanessa MacBride, Courtney Durrah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Selvester v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
John Casey Selvester
Defendant:
State of California, County of Tehama, City of Red Bluff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Selvester v. State of California et al
as 2:2024at00537
Plaintiff:
John Casey Selvester
Defendant:
State of California, County of Tehama, City of Red Bluff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Wiliams et al
as 2:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Defendant:
Brandy Wiliams, Dearon Williams and Courtney Jenell Schulte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Motley v. J. Manzanedo #17753 et al
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Courtney Motley
Defendant:
J. Manzanedo #17753, Carlos Silva #18356, Jeri Dermanetian Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
