Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc. v. Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv08430
Plaintiff:
Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc. and Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc.
Defendant:
Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, DOES 1-10 and Cathy Daniels, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Elvis Lopez v. Donald Swift, et al
as 14-35853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVIS RENTERIA CAMILO LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD SWIFT, JESUS ALVAREZ, JORGE GARCIA and others
Hounshell v. Keane et al
as 2:2013cv05121
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hounshell
Defendant:
Steve Keane, John Law, Cathy Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Swift et al
as 2:2012cv05099
Plaintiff:
Elvis Reteria Camilo Lopez
Defendant:
D Swift, J Alvarez, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Josh Donley v. Benton County Corrections, et al
as 11-35802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSH DONLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BENTON COUNTY CORRECTIONS, CATHY DANIEL, Captain, SUSAN BRAIN and others
Knutson v. Cooper et al
as 2:2011cv05060
Plaintiff:
Rodney Scott Knutson
Defendant:
Cooper, Cathy Daniel and Benton County Corrections Center Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knutson v. Daniel et al
as 2:2011cv05015
Plaintiff:
Rodney Scott Knutson
Defendant:
Cathy Daniel, Bessie and Benton County Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knutson v. Daniel et al
as 2:2011cv05014
Plaintiff:
Rodney Scott Knutson
Defendant:
Cathy Daniel and Benton County Corrections Medical Department Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. Obama et al
as 2:2011cv05012
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Owen
Defendant:
Larry D Taylor, Keane, Al Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyson v. Daniels
as 2:2010cv05023
Plaintiff:
John Alan Dyson
Defendant:
Cathy Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
