Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. California Air Resources Board et al
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, California Chamber of Commerce, American Farm Bureau Federation and others
Defendant:
California Air Resources Board, Liane M. Randolph, Steven S. Cliff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Inc, Neil Lindsay and others
Interested Party:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Computer & Communications Industry Association, NetChoice, LLC, Chamber of Progress and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor:
AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta
as 5:2022cv08861
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC doing business as NetChoice
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Eric Goldman, Chamber of Progress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beldock et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Justin Beldock, Gordon Broward and Shaadi Nezami
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Board of Trustees of Microsoft Corporation, 401(K) Administrative Committee of the Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus 401(K) Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Bracalente et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv04417
Plaintiff:
Robert Bracalente and Boris Gdalevich
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Cisco Systems, Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Cisco Systems, Inc. 401(K) Plan
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
EB5 CAPITAL et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2022cv03948
Plaintiff:
EB5 CAPITAL, CANAM ENTERPRISES, LP, CIVITAS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Abraham Bielski v. Coinbase, Inc.
as 22-15566
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ABRAHAM BIELSKI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
COINBASE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and others
Michelle Mills et al v. Molina Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mills, Coy Sarell, Chad Westover and others
Defendant:
Molina Healthcare, Inc., John Does, The Board of Directors of Molina Healthcare, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
