Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Charles Newton v. USDC-NVL
as 18-71889
:
In re: CHARLES NEWTON
Petitioner:
CHARLES NEWTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
ANDREW WINTERSTEEN and NATALIE WOOD
Newton, Jr. v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv00826
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and B. Williams
Petitioner:
Charles Newton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Dzurenda
as 2:2018cv00508
Defendant:
James Dzurenda
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01847
Defendant:
James Dzurenda and Brain Williams
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Devrenda et al
as 2:2016cv03017
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, James Devrenda and Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv01995
Defendant:
Levitt and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv01915
Defendant:
Adam Paul Laxalt and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. State of Nevada, ex rel, et al.,
as 2:2016cv01824
Defendant:
Dir of NDOC, Ms Parde, Dwight Nevens and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. State of Nevada
as 2:2016cv01770
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
