Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Apple v. Officer Chris Young et al
as 1:2022cv00309
Petitioner:
Brandon Apple
Respondent:
Officer Chris Young and Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Chris Yoo
as 17-30168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRIS YOUNG YOO, AKA Chris Yoo
M Seven System Limited v. Leap Wireless International, I, et al
as 14-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M SEVEN SYSTEM LIMITED, a Korean limited liability company
Defendant:
LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation and CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTSCOM USA, INC., a California corporation, CHRIS YOUNG CHOI, an individual, STANLEY PARK, an individual and others
Williams Bey v. Child Protective Services et al
as 2:2013cv00812
Plaintiff:
Leroy Williams Bey
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Harborview Hospital, Children's Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
M Seven System Limited v. Leap Wireless International, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01424
Plaintiff:
M Seven System Limited
Defendant:
Leap Wireless International, Inc. , Cricket Communications, Inc. , Actscom USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Williams v. Child Protective Services et al
as 2:2010cv01951
Plaintiff:
Leroy Williams
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Shawna Miller, Cynthia Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Young
as 2:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Leroy Williams
Defendant:
Chris Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hashemi et al
as 2:2010cv00025
Petitioner:
Leroy Williams
Respondent:
Aliya Hashemi, Michael Williams, Chris Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
