Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Quintanilla v. Guam Superior Court Honorable Judge Lamorena et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Guam Warden Allan Borja and Guam Superior Court Honorable Judge Lamorena
Plaintiff:
Eli Charfauros Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hackett v. Guam District Court
as 1:2024cv00012
Defendant:
Guam District Court
Plaintiff:
Clifford Ray Hackett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Philips v. Guam Courts
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Sherif Antoun Philips
Defendant:
Guam Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Song et al
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Pivnichny
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santos v. Superior Court Of Guam et al
as 1:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jay Diaz Santos
Defendant:
Superior Court Of Guam and People of Guam
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1424
Arnold v. Melwani et al
as 1:2009cv00030
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Manu P. Melwani, Anita Melwani, Lawrence J. Teker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Superior Court Of Guam et al
as 1:2008cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Allen
Defendant:
Superior Court Of Guam, Jenbel V. Manibusan and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
