Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hart et al v. Snell Crane Service, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
James N. Hart, III and Avery J. Hart
Defendant:
Snell Crane Service, Inc. and Snell Crane Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
A Millican Crane Service Inc v. Crane Works Inc
as 3:2021cv05375
Plaintiff:
A. Millican Crane Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Crane Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Certified Crane Services, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02793
Defendant:
Certified Crane Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Applied Dynamics International, Inc. et al v. DOC Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv05013
Plaintiff:
Applied Dynamics International Inc and Airo Industries Inc
Defendant:
DOC Manufacturing Inc , Snell Crane Service Rental & Sales LLC and Snell Crane Service Inc
Counter_claimant:
Snell Crane Service Inc , DOC Manufacturing Inc and Snell Crane Service Rental & Sales LLC
Counter_defendant:
Airo Industries Inc and Applied Dynamics International Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Certified Crane Services, Inc.
as 2:2017cv06577
Defendant:
Certified Crane Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund and others
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Certified Crane Services, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00915
Defendant:
Certified Crane Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund and others
Wilson et al v. Vemco Crane & Rigging, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Plaintiff:
David Alexander, Boe Ellis, Kyle Izatt and others
Defendant:
Vemco Crane & Rigging, Inc., Vernam Crane Service, Inc. and Vernam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund et al v. Snell Crane Service, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01343
Plaintiff:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund , Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Fund , Western Washington Operating Engineers-Employers Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Snell Crane Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund et al v. Northwest Tower Crane Service, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01079
Plaintiff:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund , Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Fund and Western Washington Operating Engineers-Employers Training Trust Fund
Defendant:
Northwest Tower Crane Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Certified Crane Services Inc a California corporation
as 2:2013cv02290
Defendant:
Certified Crane Services Inc
The:
Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the National IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
