Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Erie County Employees' Retirement System v. Cutera, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02560
Plaintiff:
Erie County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Cutera, Inc., David H. Mowry, Rohan Seth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Cutera, Inc. v. The Ozoned Studio Med Spa, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
Cutera, Inc.
Defendant:
The Ozoned Studio Med Spa, LLC, Ozoned Studio Med Spa 2, LLC and Jenna Jo Behlar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Borerelli v. Cutera, Inc.
as 3:2020cv04046
Plaintiff:
A.P.N. Jean M Borerelli and Jean M Borerelli A.P.N., L.T.D. doing business as Medical Aesthetics. Ltd
Defendant:
Cutera, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cutera, Inc. v. Lutronic Aesthetics, Inc.
as 2:2020at00105
Defendant:
Lutronic Aesthetics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cutera, Inc.
Cutera, Inc. v. Lutronic Aesthetics, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Lutronic Aesthetics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cutera, Inc.
Balboa Capital Corporation v. Innovix Medical PLLC al
as 8:2019cv01145
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Lori Solomon and Innovix Medical PLLC
Plaintiff:
Balboa Captial Corporation and Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Innovix Medical Corporation PLLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Counter Defendant:
Roes
3Rd Party Defendant:
Cutera Inc and MMP Capital, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeCarlo v. Cutera Inc
as 3:2017cv05997
Plaintiff:
Linda DeCarlo
Defendant:
Cutera Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2017cv05996
Plaintiff:
Linda DeCarlo
Defendant:
Cutera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kendall Jenner, Inc. et al v. Cutera, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00936
Defendant:
Cutera, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Kendall Jenner and Kendall Jenner, Inc.
Yag-Howard v. Cutera, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Cyndi Yag-Howard
Defendant:
Cutera, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
