Cases 1 - 10 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03552
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Miller v. Longs Drug Stores California, LLC
as 24-17
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, LLC, doing business as CVS
Miller v. Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kirk D Miller and Erika Miller
Defendant:
Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Lake Mathews Mineral Properties, LTD., et al v. Paul Merritt, et alIn re: Lake Mathews Mineral Properties, LTD., et al v. Paul Merritt, et al
as 23-55727
Debtor:
In the Matter of: LAKE MATHEWS MINERAL PROPERTIES, LTD.
Appellant:
PAUL MERRITT
Appellee:
PECAS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability, CHABAD TEMPLE, INC. and ELISSA D. MILLER, Trustee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
