Cases 1 - 10 of 495
Himmelberger v. Kiani et al
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dianne Himmelberger
Defendant:
Joe Kiani, Micah Young, Bilal Muhsin and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Torres v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv05013
Plaintiff:
Dianne K. Torres and Dianne K Torres
Defendant:
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harris et al v. Senior Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Harrison, Dianne Sullivan and Virginia Cole
Defendant:
Senior Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies, et al.
as 24-240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, Clerk to RETURN w/out docketing any further submissions in this closed case, #37
Defendant / Appellee:
ENCORE EVENT TECHNOLOGIES and DIANNE FERRANTE
Houston v. Golden Entertainment, et al.
as 24-95
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, DIANNE FERRANTE and others
Abraham v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2023cv02997
Plaintiff:
Kristine Dianne Abraham
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Sullivan v. Jared's Leads, Inc.
as 2:2023cv10691
Plaintiff:
Dianne Sullivan
Defendant:
Jared's Leads, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barker v. City of Scottsdale, et al.
as 23-3967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIANNE BARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a municipality of the State of Arizona, SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, sub agent City of Scottsdale, ALAN RODBELL, named as R Bell and others
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
