Cases 1 - 10 of 52
(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Melissa Danielle Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00423
Plaintiff:
Melissa Danielle Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Torres Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1004
Petitioner:
SANDRA CAROLINA TORRES MARTINEZ and CARLOS DANIEL MARTINEZ TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Foster v. Somners
as 5:2023cv04985
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Tondee, Daniel Martinez, Kathryn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
John Bright v. City of Santa Maria et al
as 2:2022cv08344
Plaintiff:
John Bright
Defendant:
City of Santa Maria, Chief Phil Hansen, Sgt. Jesus Valle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanabria-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1658
Petitioner:
ANA BEATRIZ SANABRIA-DOMINGUEZ, ALDRIN ESTUARDO MARTINEZ-SANABRIA and JOSHUA DANIEL MARTINEZ-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Daniel Martinez v. Catricia Howard
as 22-16988
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
