Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Young v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
David Allen Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Steve Marquez v. C. Rodriguez, et al
as 21-55981
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVE MARQUEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
C. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer at M.C.C. Federal Prison and L. KELLY, Correctional Officer at M.C.C. Federal Prison
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID L. YOUNG, Warden of M.C.C. Federal Prison and others
David Young v. Mercury Casualty Company
as 19-16330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID BRIGHAM YOUNG
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY
David Young, et al v. Mercury Casualty Company
as 19-16223
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHAM YOUNG
Not Yet Classified:
BRIDGE FUNDS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ANSARA
Felipe Gutierrez-Chic v. William Barr, et al
as 19-55625
Petitioner / Appellant:
FELIPE GUTIERREZ-CHIC
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID L. YOUNG, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center San Diego, STEVEN C. STAFFORD, U.S. Marshal, Southern District of California, DONALD WASHINGTON, Director, United States Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00814
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Marquez v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv00434
Plaintiff:
Steve Marquez
Defendant:
United States, Bureau of Prisons, David L. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02391
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Star Fabrics Inc v. Citi Trends Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06537
Defendant:
Citi Trends Inc., David and Young Group Corp., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
