Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ruston Panabaker, Sheri Panabaker, John J Hutson and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gicharu v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Samuel Kinuthia Gicharu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Martin O'Malley, David T. Wesling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maliglig v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00157
Plaintiff:
David T. Maliglig
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Parrish v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00836
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
David T. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ireland v. Bend Neurological Associates LLC et al
as 6:2016cv02054
Defendant:
Francena Abendroth, Michael Bell, Michael Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ireland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
McAlister v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv01664
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
David T. McAlister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ashcraft v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv02022
Plaintiff:
David T. Ashcraft
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barnes v. Viuhkola
as 3:2013cv00713
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Barnes
Defendant:
David T. Viuhkola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Viuhkola
as 3:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Barnes
Defendant:
David T. Viuhkola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
