Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. One IA Potters House Church et al
as 2:2024cv04530
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant: One IA Potters House Church, Potters House Church of LA, St. Philip Neri Catholic Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant: Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonio White, et al v. Calvin Broadus, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55864
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTONIO WHITE and CRAIG WARD
Defendant - Appellee: CALVIN BROADUS, Jr., DBA Snoop Dog, MARION KNIGHT and ANDRE YOUNG, DBA Dr. Dre
Defendant: WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING CORP., RICARDO BROWN, DBA Kurupt and WARREN GRIFFIN III, DBA Warren G.
Antonio White, et al v. Calvin Broadus, Jr., et al
as 17-55864
Defendant: WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING CORP., RICARDO BROWN, DBA Kurupt and WARREN GRIFFIN III, DBA Warren G.
Plaintiff / Appellant: CRAIG WARD and ANTONIO WHITE
Defendant / Appellee: MARION KNIGHT, CALVIN BROADUS, Jr., DBA Snoop Dog and ANDRE YOUNG, DBA Dr. Dre
Antonio White et al v. Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05831
Plaintiff: Antonio White and Craig Ward
Defendant: Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corporation, Marion Suge Knight, Mr. Calvin Broadus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Riches v. McCartney, et al
as 08-15212
Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL MCCARTNEY, HEATHER MILLS, ELTON JOHN and others
Riches v. McCartney et al Featured Case
as 3:2007cv05878
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant: Paul McCartney, Heather Mills, Elton John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?