Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harris v. Alchley et al
as 5:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harris
Defendant:
Warden Matthew Alchley and Dr. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Fox v. Uribe et al
as 5:2018cv07221
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, Dr. Nguyen, Dr. B. Brizendine and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard James Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Lide v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2014cv09165
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Dietz, J. Dietz and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lide
Joseph Dursma v. Randy Sid, et al
as 12-15954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DURSMA
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY SID, M.D., LESLIE FOX, Nurse, DR. NGUYEN and others
Mavis Savannah Thompson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2010cv01859
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, John Does, Dr. Hoeltzer and others
Plaintiff:
Mavis Savannah Thompson
Thompson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2010cv02383
Plaintiff:
Mavis Savannah Thompson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Dr. Wong, Dr. Sakata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Shehata v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-56799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK F. SHEHATA
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Sec'y Dept of Correc., M. POULOS, Warden, CIM, J. HARTLEY, Warden, ASP and others
Mark F. Shehata v. Mathew Cate et al
as 5:2010cv01246
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, R Chapnick, Dr Conanan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark F Shehata
Neil Corrow v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2008cv05815
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, Cunningham, Deboise and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Corrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
