Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Tyler Evan James et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
TYLER E JAMES and Tyler Evan James
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPUTY LUTTENBACHER, DEPUTY MENDOZA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Feranec et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03942
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerald R. Feranec , Patricia Crawford , Michael L. Hoskin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rickleffs v. Velasquez et al
as 1:2013cv02953
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rickleffs
Defendant:
Velasquez and E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaeme v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01768
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , Allied Security Holdings, L.L.C., AlliedBarton Security Services, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Graebner et al v. James et al
as 3:2012cv01694
Plaintiff:
E. Bertita Trabert Graebner , Tallie R. Trabert and T. Vernon Trabert
Defendant:
Michael E. James, MNM Properties, LLC, WM Page & Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
James v. Rackley et al
as 2:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
John E. James, III
Defendant:
R. J. Rackley, Kim, Dunkan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curley E James v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv05267
Petitioner:
Curley E James
Respondent:
United States of America
James v. Scribner
as 1:2004cv05878
Plaintiff:
John E. James, III
Defendant:
A K Scribner, - Beer , J Cantwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv02851
Plaintiff:
Brenton E. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
