Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Michael Aisley v. Eliassen Group, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04599
Plaintiff:
Michael Aisley
Defendant:
Eliassen Group, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dennis E Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wagner v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2018cv01609
Plaintiff:
David E. Wagner
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clinton Erin Daigle v. City of Hemet, et al
as 5:2015cv00209
Defendant:
City of Hemet, Derek Maddox, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Erin Daigle
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dennis E Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fisher v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv01800
Plaintiff:
Gary Francis Fisher
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Gipson, E Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fisher v. Brown et al
as 5:2013cv02569
Plaintiff:
Gary Francis Fisher
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Gipson, E. Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barger v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
Gary Dale Barger
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Castano et al
as 1:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
D. Castano, H. Nguyen, Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Campbell v. Riverside Police Dept et al
as 5:2010cv01186
Plaintiff:
Brandon Campbell
Defendant:
Does, Officer David Johansen and Riverside Police Dept
Attorney Settlement Officer:
Dennis E Wagner
Joshua v. Mendoza-Powers et al
as 1:2007cv01122
Plaintiff:
Rory Joshua
Defendant:
Mendoza-Powers, Suryadevara, Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
