Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Eddie Thomas, Jr. v. State of Nevada, et al
as 23-15884
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDDIE JAMES THOMAS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, TIM GARRENT, L.C.C. Warden and AARON FORD, Att.Gen. for the State of Nev.
Thomas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Petitioner:
Eddie James Thomas
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Tim Garrent and Aaron Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00713
Plaintiff:
Anthony Louis Sam, Elaine T. Berrio, Angela T. Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thomas v. Churchill et al
as 2:2018cv02331
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Thomas
Defendant:
Serna, Churchill, Borrowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Adams et al
as 1:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Otis Atkins
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, A. Musleh and Rubbacaba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Baca et al
as 3:2013cv00043
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eddie James Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eddie James Otis Atkins v. People Superior Court State of California
as 2:2013cv00382
Petitioner:
Eddie James Otis Atkins
Respondent:
People Superior Court State of California
Eddie Smith v. George Neotti
as 12-55151
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE JAMES SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE A. NEOTTI, Warden
Atkins v. Adams, et al.
as 1:2010cv00755
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Otis Atkins
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, A. Musleh, John Doe 1 C/O and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie James Smith v. George A. Neotti
as 2:2009cv07468
Petitioner:
Eddie James Smith
Respondent:
George A. Neotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
