Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Erin R. Amie v. State of California
as 2:2022cv06329
Petitioner:
Erin R. Amie
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erin R Amie v. The State of California
as 2:2020cv07078
Defendant:
The State of California
Plaintiff:
Erin R Amie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erin R. Amie v. S. Sherman et al
as 2:2020cv04916
Respondent:
S. Sherman and Attorney General of the State of California
Petitioner:
Erin R Amie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amie v. Sherman et al
as 3:2020cv00897
Petitioner:
Erin R. Amie
Respondent:
S. Sherman and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parto Kavoosian, et al v. Michael Pompeo, et al
as 20-55325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A.S. 2, minor, PARTO KAVOOSIAN, FARSHAD AMIRKHANI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DEAN M. KAPLAN, in official capacity as member of U.S. Department of State's PP 9645 Brain Trust, DANIEL E. MICKELSON, in official capacity as member of U.S. Department of State's PP 9645 Brain Trust and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv05782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019at00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
