Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,576
Hawkins v. The City of Eugene et al
as 6:2024cv00951
Plaintiff: Christopher Hawkins
Defendant: The City of Eugene, John I-V Does and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff: Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant: Kenneth Williams, Barrett, Joseph Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Li v. Roblox Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv03484
Plaintiff: Eugene Li
Defendant: Roblox Corp., David Baszucki, Michael Guthrie and others
Garvie v. Bennett
as 24-3606
Petitioner: EUGENE BRIAN GARVIE
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner: Eugene William Hillman
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Eugene Bowermaster v. Corporal Luis et al
as 2:2024cv04832
Plaintiff: Charles Eugene Bowermaster
Defendant: Corparal Luis and Deputy Navarette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shotwell v. Chavez-Epperson, et al.
as 24-3459
Plaintiff: MANUEL EUGENE SHOTWELL
Defendant: CHAVEZ-EPPERSON, DELANEY, E. MEDINA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00707
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01585
Plaintiff: Ronald Eugene James
Defendant: Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?