Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16272
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16057
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16059
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15915
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Carter v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08110
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Joseph George Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08094
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Joseph George Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08075
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Joseph George Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. B Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02090
Defendant: B Plumbing, Inc. and George Carter Johnson, Jr.
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Christmas Bonus Fund, Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Defined Contribution Trust Fund and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?