Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Blue Sky The Color of Imagination, LLC v. Noteworthy Paper and Press, Inc.
as 9:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Notworthy Paper and Press. Inc. and Noteworthy Paper and Press. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Sky The Color of Imagination, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Blue Sky The Color of Imagination, LLC v. Noteworthy Paper and Press, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00560
Plaintiff:
Blue Sky The Color of Imagination, LLC
Defendant:
Noteworthy Paper & Press, Inc. and Notworthy Paper and Press. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Pure Imagination LLC v. Adaptics Limited
as 3:2014cv05976
Plaintiff:
Pure Imagination LLC
Defendant:
Adaptics Limited and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
WowWee Group Limited v. Michael Wallace et al
as 3:2012cv05568
Plaintiff:
WowWee Group Limited , Wow Wee Canada Inc and Wow Wee USA Inc
Defendant:
Michael Wallace , Pure Imagination LLC , 628 Design LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WowWee Group Limited v. Michael Wallace et al
as 2:2012cv02298
Defendant:
628 Design LLC, Does, Philip Odom and others
Plaintiff:
Wow Wee Canada Inc, Wow Wee USA Inc and WowWee Group Limited
Blue Sky The Color of Imagination, LLC v. Mead Westvaco Corporation
as 2:2010cv02175
Plaintiff:
Blue Sky The Color of Imagination, LLC
Defendant:
Mead Westvaco Corporation
Connective Tissue Imagineering, LLC v. Mitts et al
as 3:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
Connective Tissue Imagineering, LLC, Connective Tissue Imagineering, LLC and Connective Tissue Imagineering, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas F. Mitts, Thomas F. Mitts, Thomas F. Mitts and others
Counter-claimant:
Thomas F. Mitts, Thomas F. Mitts, Thomas F. Mitts and others
Counter-defendant:
Connective Tissue Imagineering, LLC, Connective Tissue Imagineering, LLC and Connective Tissue Imagineering, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
