Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Ramirez Yanez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4942
Petitioner:
PUEBLITO DANIELA RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ, MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ, OLIVA RAMIREZ YANEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-4814
Petitioner:
JOSE FIDENCIO RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez Rafael v. Garland
as 24-3206
Petitioner:
JOSE OSWVALDO RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, JOSE LUIS TELLO-ROBLES, NICOLE ELYSE BROOKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rodriguez v. Hardy et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
David A. Hardy and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Chalas
as 3:2023cv04728
Plaintiff:
Jose A Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Marisol A. Chalas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
(PS) Ahmad v. Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Noman Ahmad
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, El Concilio, LLC, Martin Hoshino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. World World Way et al
as 4:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
World World Way and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. World World Way
as 3:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
World World Way and Coalinga State Hospital
Defendant:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
