Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Koken-ji Temple et al
as 2:2024cv04684
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Koken-ji Temple, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Warren Buffett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
America Premier International Investments, Inc et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 8:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
America Premier International Investments, Inc and Wei Ji
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In Re Ex Parte Application of Min-ji Kim et al
as 5:2024mc80072
Not Yet Classified:
Google, LLC
Plaintiff:
Min-ji Kim, Pham Ngoc Han, Ji-hye Mo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Adjustment of Status of Nonimmigrant to Permanent Resident
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ji Zeqin v. Jiuding International Inc et al
as 8:2023cv02449
Plaintiff:
Ji Zeqin
Defendant:
Jiuding International Inc, Lao Ma Tou Hotpot, Inc., Lao Ma Tou Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
