Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Juan Chavez v. American Express, et al
as 23-55808
Plaintiff / Appellant: JUAN PABLO CHAVEZ, Prince of New York
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN EXPRESS, HIGH YIELD SAVINGS, CASH APP and others
Erick Dodakian v. Andrew Butters, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15484
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERICK JOHN DODAKIAN
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW BUTTERS, Badge #21242 and CITY OF TEMPE, AKA Tempe Police Department
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5, Black Corporations 1-5 and White Partnerships 1-5
Patsy Sakuma v. Assoc. of Apt. Owners of the Tropics at Waikele, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16929
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATSY N. SAKUMA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, MILTON M. MOTOOKA, an individual, LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership and others
Kenette Paredes, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15459
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENETTE A. PAREDES
Plaintiff: EDGARD PAREDES, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba Department of the Navy, The Navy Exchange Mall at Pearl Harbor
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-10; Jane Does, 1-10; Doe Partnerships; Doe Corporations, 1-10; Doe Entities, 1-10; Roe Governmental Entities, 1-10
Kyra Bernhardt v. County of Hawaii, et al
as 21-16014
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; Doe Partnerships 1-10; Doe Unincorporated Organizations 1-10, STANLEY KAINA, in his individual capacity and as a Police Officer of the Hawaii Police Department and COUNTY OF HAWAII
Plaintiff / Appellant: KYRA BERNHARDT, in her individual capacity and as Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF GENE BERNHARDT aka MERVYN GENE BERNHARDT
Tiffany Franco v. Mesa Public Schools, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15624
Defendant / Appellee: LISA SHUPE, ROSS PAGEL, JEREMY JONES and others
Defendant: PAGEL, First name unknown; named as Jane Doe, a married couple, SHUPE, First name unknown; named as John Doe, a married couple, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Black Corporations 1-10; White Partnerships 1-10 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIFFANY FRANCO
Matt Yamashita v. LG Chem, Ltd., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-17512
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM, LTD. and LG CHEM AMERICA, INC.
Defendant: COILART, DOES, DOE LG Entities 1-10; John Does 1 - 10 ; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; Doe Partnerships 1-10; Doe Limited Liability Companies 1-10; Doe Business Entities 1-10; Doe Governmental Entities 1-10; Doe Unincorporated Associations 1-10, GEARBEST.COM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATT YAMASHITA
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. Paul Penzone, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16594
Defendant / Appellee: P. TORRES, Secretary, FPC-Phoenix, COPELAND, Ms., Case Manager, FPC-Phoenix, PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff of Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Jail Commander, Estrella Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-15999
Defendant / Appellee: P. TORRES, Secretary, FPC-Phoenix, COPELAND, Ms., Case Manager, FPC-Phoenix, PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff of Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Jail Commander, Estrella Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY
Lester Riter, et al v. Richard Wacker, et al
as 20-15290
Defendant / Appellee: SUMMER OKADA, DOES, John Does 1-50; Jane Does 1-50 ; Doe Partnerships 1-50 ; Doe Corporations 1-50 ; Doe Entities 1-50; Doe Governmental Units 1-50, GERALDINE K. CHEPLIC, American Mutual Group and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LESTER EUGENE RITER and TERESA MARIE ALTMAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?