Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Caldwell Transport Services, LLC v. E.F. Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Caldwell Transport Services, LLC
Defendant:
E.F. Corporation a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as West Motor Freight and John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471 Federal Aviation Act
Lietz, et al. v. Drug Enforcement Administration, et al.
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Paul Lietz, Sakahann Ouch, Vutha Ren and others
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, SA Colin Fine, SA David Clyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolon v. Migliori et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
John & Jane Does A-Z, Kevin G. Shea, Grant W. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio V Rolon and Antonio V. Rolon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Root et al
as 1:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Charles
Defendant:
Curtis Root, Lori Sperry, City of Boise, Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Corrections Corporation of America, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00434
Plaintiff:
Scotty James Bailey
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, LLC, Todd J Mullinger, David W Agler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fizer et al v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator et al
as 4:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Clint Fizer and Sandy Fizer
Defendant:
ThyssenKrupp Elevator and John and/or Jane Does I through V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
Bob Jones
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
Leon Murray
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderton v. Nye
as 4:2009cv00419
Plaintiff:
Bardell J Anderton
Defendant:
David C Nye and Unknown/un-named John and/or Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
