Cases 1 - 10 of 27
James T. Moreno v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 5:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
James T. Moreno
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, J. Clark Kelson, David Holbook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mackey v. Allison et al
as 5:2021cv09386
Plaintiff:
Michael Mackey
Defendant:
K. Allison, Ron Bloomfield, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mr. Gregory Downs v. J. Clark Kelson et al
as 2:2020cv03020
Respondent:
CCOPA President, J. Clark Kelson and CDCR Secretary
Petitioner:
Mr. Gregory Downs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James McCurdy v. B. Deal, et al
as 19-17108
Defendant:
MICHAEL FELDER, BICK, M.D., J. CLARK KELSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DEAL, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CLAYTON MCCURDY
Believe P. Kelson v. J. Gastelo et al
as 2:2018cv08464
Plaintiff:
Believe P. Kelson
Defendant:
R. Hallet, Josie Gastelo, J. Poquette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric K'napp v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-15577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
John E. Colbert v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
John E. Colbert
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Paul D. Brazelton, Edmund Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balwinder Tung v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 16-17303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BALWINDER SINGH TUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., JEFFREY BEARD and J. CLARK KELSON, Receiver California Prison Health Care Services
Believe P. Kelson v. Elvin Valenzuela
as 2:2015cv04914
Petitioner:
Believe P. Kelson
Respondent:
Elvin Valenzuela
Sullivan v. Biter et al
as 1:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Michael John Sullivan
Defendant:
M. D. Biter, Matthew Cates, J. Clark Kelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
