Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kevin Roya, Sr. v. Everport-Evergreen Terminal Services, et al
as 22-16823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN EDWARD ROYA, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
EVERPORT-EVERGREEN TERMINAL SERVICES, MICHAEL ANDREWS, MARCUS DAVIS and others
Kevin Roya, Sr. v. Everport-Evergreen Terminal, et al
as 20-16143
Defendant / Appellee:
RON CHESLY, EDWARD HENDERSON, MARCUS DAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN EDWARD ROYA, Sr.
Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation v. Hamrick & Evans, LLP et al
as 3:2020cv03669
Defendant:
Chateau De Louis LLC, Stephen Samuels, Seth Samuels and others
Plaintiff:
Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roya v. Everport-Evergreen Terminal Services et al
as 3:2020cv02108
Defendant:
Kenneth Green, Ron Chesly, Everport-Evergreen Terminal Services and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Roya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roya v. Everport-Evergreen Terminal Services et al
as 3:2020cv02105
Defendant:
Kenneth Green, Everport-Evergreen Terminal Services, Michael Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Roya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roya v. Everport-Evergreen Terminal Services (EST)
as 3:2018cv06141
Defendant:
Davis Marcus, Everport Terminal Services, Inc., Andrews Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Roya and Kevin Roya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kenneth Green v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Green
Defendant:
United States of America
Hairston v. Brieman et al
as 3:2017cv01414
Petitioner:
Robey Hairston
Respondent:
Brieman , L. Bordonisen , Kenneth Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. CDCR et al
as 2:2011cv01515
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Green
Defendant:
CDCR, James E. Hilton and James Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
