Cases 1 - 10 of 5,468
Watkins v. City Of Anaheim et al
as 8:2024cv02046
Defendant:
City Of Anaheim, Officer Ryan Wardle, Officers DOE Officers 1 - 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABITBOL v. CURRENT ENERGY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv08132
Defendant:
KEVIN ADAMS and CURRENT ENERGY LLC
Plaintiff:
MIRYAM ABITBOL
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(PC) Jackson v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv02556
Plaintiff:
Julius C. Jackson
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre, B. Alkire, Kevin Rueter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08000
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bagley et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Bagley and Kevin M. Bagley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 rt IRS: Refund Taxes
Bushansky v. Doximity, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06459
Defendant:
Doximity, Inc., Kevin Spain, Timothy Cabral and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Silva v. Sayer et al
as 3:2024cv01645
Defendant:
Mark G. Foletta, Richard A. Collins, Rimma Driscoll and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan C. Silva
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
(HC) Grigsby v. Hixon
as 2:2024cv02488
Respondent:
Kevin Hixon
Petitioner:
Melvin John Grigsby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv07756
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
