Cases 1 - 10 of 22
(PC) Welk v. CA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA. Dept. of Corrections, Robert Mayes, Mejorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Givens v. Lotesztain et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Defendant:
Dr. Mayes, Michael Gonzaga, Dr. N. Largoza and others
Plaintiff:
Francois P. Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Givens v. Lotesztain et al
as 2:2021cv00591
Defendant:
Dr. Mayes, Michael Gonzaga, Dr. N. Largoza and others
Plaintiff:
Francois P. Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Branch v. Lori Austin, et al
as 20-16355
Defendant / Appellee:
B. HADE, Medical Doctor, LORI AUSTIN, Chief Executive Officer Health Care, A. MULLIGAN-PFILE, Physician and Surgeon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS BRANCH
Albert Hamilton v. M. Armstrong, et al
as 20-15284
Defendant / Appellee:
J. RANKIN, G. HERNANDEZ, CHASTAIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT J. HAMILTON
(PC) Gleason v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2020cv00369
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and L. Largoza
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Gleason, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Vaden v. Mayes et al
as 2:2019cv02216
Defendant:
C. McPherson, Dr. Robert L. Mayes, Marcus Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Vaden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaden, Jr. v. Mayes et al
as 3:2019cv06449
Defendant:
Lt. Blackwell, C. McPherson, Sgt. Primm and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Vaden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Branch v. Austin et al
as 2:2019cv01742
Defendant:
Jason Rohrer, B. Hade, A. Mulligan-Pfile and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Bontemps v. Ko Francis, et al
as 19-16379
Defendant / Appellee:
T. WAMBLE, ADA Associate Warden, KO FRANCIS, Physician Surgeon and N. LARGOZA, Chief Physician Surgeon
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY C. BONTEMPS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
