Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Howard Grobstein v. Office of The United States Trustee
as 2:2023cv07371
Plaintiff: Liquidating Trustee Howard Grobstein
Defendant: Office of The United States Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. Scientific Games Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01637
Defendant: Scientific Games Corporation, Bally Technologies, Inc. and Bally Gaming, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma doing business as Tonkawa Enterprises, Umpqua Indian Development Corporation and Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians
Intervenor: Alfred T. Giuliano as Liquidation Trustee for RIH Acquisitions NJ, LLC doing business as Magnolia House Casino doing business as The Atlantic Club Casino Hotel and Ranchos Club Casino, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
L. Scott Apparel, Inc., et al v. Lowell Sharron, et alIn re: L. Scott Apparel, Inc., et al v. Lowell Sharron, et al
as 20-55555
Defendant / Appellee: LOWELL SHARRON, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellant: HOWARD B. GROBSTEIN, Liquidating Trustee of L. Scott Apparel, Inc.
Defendant: BEYOND BASICS LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA Daily Threads
Debtor: In the Matter of: L. SCOTT APPAREL, INC.
L. Scott Apparel, Inc., et al v. Lowell Sharron, et alIn re: L. Scott Apparel, Inc., et al v. Lowell Sharron, et al
as 20-55507
Defendant / Appellant: LOWELL SHARRON, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellee: HOWARD B. GROBSTEIN, Liquidating Trustee of L. Scott Apparel, Inc.
Defendant: BEYOND BASICS LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA Daily Threads
Debtor: In the Matter of: L. SCOTT APPAREL, INC.
Epicenter Loss Recovery LLC, et al v. Burford Capital Limited, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15391
Defendant / Appellee: BURFORD CAPITAL LIMITED and GANYMEDE INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Plaintiff: ROI PROPERTIES, INC., as Liquidating Trustee; estate of Epicenter Partners LLC; estate of Gray Meyer Fannin LLC, EPICENTER PARTNERS LLC and GRAY MEYER FANNIN LLC, by and through ROI Properties LLC, Liquidating Trustee of the May Liquidating Trust
Plaintiff / Appellant: EPICENTER LOSS RECOVERY LLC
High Street Buildings LLC v. Lisa Atkins, et al
as 19-16215
Defendant / Appellee: ROI PROPERTIES LLC, acting by and through Beth Jo Zeitzer, in its capacity as Liquidating Trustee of the May Liquidating Trust and as sole manager of Epicenter Partners LLC and Gray Meyer Fanniin LLC trustee of Beth Jo Zeitzer trustee of May Liquidat, BRUCE W. GRAY, GRAY/WESTERN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HIGH STREET BUILDINGS LLC
In re: Walldesign, Inc., et al v. Brian Weiss We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-60048
Debtor: In re: WALLDESIGN, INC., a California corporation
Appellant: FRANCOIS FRERES USA, INC.
Appellee: BRIAN WEISS, Liquidation Trustee, Walldesign, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02522
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02421
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant: Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent: Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Petitioner: Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant: Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party: Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?