Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Rafael Martinez v. Jose Luis Martinez et al
as 2:2023cv10040
Plaintiff:
Rafael Martinez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Martinez, Nina De Rocio Romero and Does 1 to 10
Jason Wesley Wiley v. Hestrin A. Michael et a
as 5:2023cv01463
Petitioner:
Jason Wesley Wiley
Respondent:
Hestrin A. Michael and Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avag Topachikyan v. Luis Martinez
as 2:2023cv04315
Petitioner:
Avag Topachikyan
Respondent:
Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Topachikyan et al
as 2:2023cv04314
Petitioner:
Luis Martinez and Avag Topachikyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avag Topachikyan v. Luis Martinez
as 5:2023cv01049
Petitioner:
Avag Topachikyan
Respondent:
Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Thompkins v. Martinez et al
as 2:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Raymond Thompkins
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber and Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sebren Abbalum Pierce v. Luis Martinez
as 5:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
Sebren Abbalum Pierce
Respondent:
Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00207
Petitioner:
Luis Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(HC) Timberlake v. Martinez
as 1:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
Paul Edward Timberlake
Respondent:
Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juan T. Tyler v. Luis Martinez
as 2:2022cv08250
Petitioner:
Juan T Tyler and Juan T. Tyler
Respondent:
Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
