Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Demos v. Bayer, et al.
as 24-828
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP, M. MORENO, Major Hearings Officer, WSP and others
John Demos, Jr. v. USDC-WAWSE
as 23-70132
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr., DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP and others
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Demos v. Moreno et al
as 3:2023cv05603
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr and Abner Edras Maiominides
Defendant:
M Moreno, Robert Jackson, Daniel Bayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Bayer et al
as 2:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Bayer, Jennifer Adams, M Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eileen M. Moreno v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv01551
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Eileen M Moreno
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Moreno et al
as 2:2017cv00680
Defendant:
EL Chamizal, LLC, Juan M Moreno and Maria Luna Valle
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Anna M. Moreno v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 2:2016cv00667
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Moreno
Jose M Moreno v. W. L. Montgomery
as 2:2015cv05100
Respondent:
W. L. Montgomery
Petitioner:
Jose M Moreno
Thompson v. Meyer-Zlokovich et al
as 1:2014cv01521
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Thompson
Defendant:
D. Meyer-Zlokovich , M. Moreno , C. Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Meyer-Zlokovich et al
as 1:2014at00709
Plaintiff:
Andrew B Thompson
Defendant:
D. Meyer-Zlokovich, M. Moreno, C. Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
