Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Elem #086747 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Henry Elem, III
Defendant:
David Shinn, M Murdey, Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Ducey et al
as 4:2020cv00287
Defendant:
David Neal, Unknown Pacheco, Nataylie Weizel and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #038313 v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv05694
Defendant:
CT Wright, Michael Johnson, Unknown Clemency and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02512
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter #38313 v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv02114
Plaintiff:
James Ray Hunter
Defendant:
C.T. Wright, Arizona Board of Executive Clemency, Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Roberto Martinez, Laura Rubicek, Tucson Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne Lukas Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00031
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02936
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fraser-Johnson et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
Bianca Fraser-Johnson and Michael Johnson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated , Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated , Christiana Care Health Services Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
