Cases 1 - 10 of 16
De Cristo Cano et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Corazon De Cristo Cano, Terry Hardin, Crystal Irvin and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Magill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2021cv01877
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R Magill and Nicholas R. Magill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Magill v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Bausch Health Companies Inc. and L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dustin Magill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2018mc80080
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sines , Seth Wispelwey , Marissa Blair and others
Defendant:
Jason Kessler, Richard Spencer, Christopher Cantwell and others
Patent Holder, LLC. v. Magill et al
as 3:2017cv02082
Plaintiff:
Patent Holder, LLC.
Defendant:
Leonard L. Magill , Lmp/Mail Order Video Inc. and Magill's Glockstore
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Kinsale Insurance Company v. Brilliant Management Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01402
Cross Defendant:
Brilliant Management Inc., Tricia Coelho, Kookmin Best Insurance Company (US Branch) and others
Defendant:
Brilliant Management Inc., Tricia Coehho, Kookmin Best Insurance Company US Branch and others
Counter Defendant:
Kinsale Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kinsale Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Sequoia Insurance Company
Cross Claimant:
Sequoia Insurance Company
Anthony Addision et al v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08109
Plaintiff:
Anthony Addision, Pierre Cooper, Matthew Ehly and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC and DTV Home Services II LLC
Jason Magill v. Hemet Unified School District et al
as 5:2011cv01686
Defendant:
Does, Marcella Graham and Hemet Unified School District
Plaintiff:
Jason Magill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
