Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Harper v. Peterson et al
as 5:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOHANNON et al v. DAVID MCDONALD dba MCDONALD DEVELOPMENT and/or PACIFIC BUILDING et al
as 5:2022mc80190
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BOHANNON and DEENA BOHANNON
Defendant:
DAVID MCDONALD dba MCDONALD DEVELOPMENT and/or PACIFIC BUILDING, MARTIN MCDONALD, HAL PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
BOHANNON et al v. MCDONALD et al
as 3:2022cv04422
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BOHANNON and DEENA BOHANNON
Defendant:
DAVID MCDONALD dba MCDONALD DEVELOPMENT and/or PACIFIC BUILDING, MARTIN MCDONALD, HAL PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Adams v. Adodojaji et al
as 4:2018cv04582
Defendant:
Kabu Adodojaji and Mark Peterson
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2018cv00923
Plaintiff:
Mark Peterson
Defendant:
San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Peterson v. Parkash
as 2:2018cv00514
Plaintiff:
Mark Peterson
Defendant:
Ram Parkash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamestop Inc.
as 2:2017at00368
Plaintiff:
Gamestop Inc.
Defendant:
bridgett, Mark Peterson and Michael Hestrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
