Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clark v. Marquis Companies et al
as 3:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Brooklynn Clark
Defendant:
Marquis Companies, Emily Walton, Katy Zaharte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marquis Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2018mc00033
Defendant:
Richard Clatfelter, Chad Deucher, Jessica Deucher and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Dean v. Marquis et al
as 3:2016cv02124
Defendant:
Ron Brown, Paula Brownhill and Joushua K. Marquis
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. DBA et al
as 3:2015cv00805
Respondent:
Ron Brown, Judge Paula J. Brownhill, Clerks of Clatsop County Circuit Court and others
Petitioner:
David-Paul Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spenser v. USA
as 3:2014cv00549
Petitioner:
Depri Marquis Spenser
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tagwerker v. Marquis Companies I, Inc.
as 6:2013cv02215
Defendant:
Marquis Companies I, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tamara Tagwerker
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment & Re-Employment Rights Act
Barnett v. Marquis et al
as 3:2013cv01588
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Barnett
Defendant:
Ronald Brown, Clatsop County, Clatsop County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wilson v. Wheeler et al
as 6:2011cv06105
Defendant:
Darcey Baker, Ronald Brown, Michael T. Dugan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
