Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv00556
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. USA
as 3:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
Barry Michael Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gillman et al v. Shack Findlay Automotive, LLC
as 2:2015cv02060
Plaintiff:
Melissa Leann Gillman and Troy Michael Jones
Defendant:
Shack Findlay Automotive, LLC and Wells Fargo Dealer Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NOT USED
as 2:2015cv02025
Plaintiff:
Melissa Leann Gillman and Troy Michael Jones
Defendant:
Shack-Findlay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jones v. County of Clark et al
as 2:2013cv01002
Defendant:
County of Clark and Las Vegas Metro Police Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SilkSkin, Inc. v. Evening Sky, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00247
Defendant:
Evening Sky, LLC, Emilee Newell Harmon, Michael Jones and others
Plaintiff:
SilkSkin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bill Adamson et al. Vs. USA
as 3:2008cv00621
Plaintiff:
Bill Adamson, Sharon Adamson, Lorillee A. Babcock and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kroshus et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
Judy Kroshus, PATRICIA REINSMA, DENNIS MORELLI and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Dirk Kempthorne, Elizabeth Rieke and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
