Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kim v. Eargo, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Sang Hyun Michael Kim
Defendant:
Eargo, Inc., Donald Spence, Katie J. Bayne and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jung Won Yun v. Chung Cha Kim et al
as 5:2020cv02266
Petitioner:
Jung Won Yun
Respondent:
Michael Kim, Chung Cha Kim and Monica Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green World Council Bluffs LLC et al v. 1Sharpe Opportunity Intermediate Fund LP et al
as 2:2020cv01579
Defendant:
Travis Masters, Derrick Land, Churchill Real Estate Partners LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim and Green World Council Bluffs LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Myoungchul Shin et al v. UNI-CAPS, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv01387
Plaintiff:
Seongmin Cho, Yongseon Kim and Myoungchul Shin
Defendant:
Does, Michael Kim, Sang H. Kim and others
Myoungchul Shin et al v. UNI-CAPS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06746
Plaintiff:
Seongmin Cho, Yongseon Kim and Myoungchul Shin
Defendant:
Does, Michael Kim, Sang H. Kim and others
Myoungchul Shin et al v. UNI-CAPS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv03575
Plaintiff:
Seongmin Cho, Yongseon Kim and Myoungchul Shin
Defendant:
Does, Michael Kim, Sang H. Kim and others
Trillo v. Director of CDC, et al
as 2:2012cv01805
Plaintiff:
Jesse Araiza Trillo
Defendant:
Director of California Department of Corrections, Keith Wong, P. Mallory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. California Depart. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Webb
Defendant:
California Depart. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Kim and Duel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
