Cases 1 - 10 of 24
(PC) Diaz v. Osman et al
as 2:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz and Miguel Enrique Diaz
Defendant:
M. Osman, DiTomas, Amy Magaruh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz-Ortega v. Garland
as 22-516
Petitioner:
JOSE MIGUEL DIAZ-ORTEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jesus Villegas, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-56376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESUS VILLEGAS, LUCIO VILLEGAS, KARLA JINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL MOORE, Chief of Police and others
Loera et al v. TruGreen, Inc. et al
as 2:2021at00808
Plaintiff:
Adam Loera and Miguel Diaz
Defendant:
TruGreen, Inc. and TruGreen Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loera et al v. TruGreen, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Adam Loera and Miguel Diaz
Defendant:
TruGreen, Inc. and TruGreen Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jesus Villegas et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv07469
Plaintiff:
Karla Jinez, Jan Breidenbach, Dan Stomer and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Chief of Police Michel Moore and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Diaz-Ortega v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72130
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL DIAZ-ORTEGA, AKA Jose Miguel Diaz
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Pedro Diaz v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71882
Petitioner:
PEDRO MIGUEL DIAZ, AKA Miguel Rodriguez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Miguel Diaz Garcia v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2015cv03440
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz Garcia
Diaz v. Fox et al
as 2:2014cv02705
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Defendant:
R. Fox, D. Cueva, S. Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
