Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miguel Gonzalez et al v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv08261
Petitioner:
Miguel Gonzalez and Carla Gonzalez
Respondent:
Carnival Corporation, Carnival PLC and Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez et al v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv04682
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gonzalez and Carla Gonzalez
Defendant:
Carnival PLC, Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miguel Gonzalez et al v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv01195
Defendant:
Carnival PLC, Carnival Corporation and Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gonzalez, - and Miguel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00193
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miguel Gonzalez Garduno v. William Barr, et al
as 20-70962
Petitioner:
MIGUEL GONZALEZ GARDUNO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Jose Gonzalez v. William Barr
as 20-70750
Petitioner:
JOSE MIGUEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Santiago Diaz v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv04075
Defendant:
Police Officer Christopher Ballerini, Police Officer Eliseo Brito, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Diaz
Mediator (ADR Panel:
Bryan B Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
