Cases 1 - 10 of 551
Vasquez v. Fast Track Leasing LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Vasquez
Defendant:
Fast Track Leasing LLC and Deninson Dugarte Rivas
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Federal Odometer Act
(PC) Murillo v. Covello, et al.
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Mr. Canelo, Stephanie Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3109
Petitioner:
MIGUEL MURILLO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Murillo v. Covello et al
as 1:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello, Mr. Canelo, Stephanie Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Laura Salgado Fuentes et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Laura Salgado Fuentes and Gabriel Gomez Murillo
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Mauro Flores Murillo v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00623
Petitioner:
Mauro Flores Murillo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Castellanos-Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1386
Petitioner:
ELVIN NAHUM CASTELLANOS-MURILLO and LEANDRO CASTELLANOS-FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Murillo v. Mule Creek State Prison
as 3:2024cv00935
Petitioner:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Respondent:
Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
