Cases 1 - 10 of 16
(PC) Escamilla v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), State of California, CDCR and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Miguel Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Martin v. Pogue et al
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Tyson J. Pogue, Mendoza, N. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aubrey Brothers, III v. Chita Buenafe, et al
as 21-16810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUBREY LEE BROTHERS III
Defendant / Appellee:
CHITA BUENAFE, N. RAMIREZ and T. HOOD
Defendant:
N. FLORES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brothers, II v. Buenafe et al
as 1:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Lee Brothers, II
Defendant:
Chita Buenafe, N. Flores and T. Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubrey Brothers, III v. CSP-Los Angeles County, et al
as 17-55495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUBREY LEE BROTHERS III
Defendant - Appellee:
CSP-LOS ANGELES COUNTY, A. JOHAL, Medical Doctor, individual and official capacity, ARMEN AZATIAN, Psychiatrist, individual and official capacity and others
Aubrey Lee Brothers, II v. CSP Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2017cv00856
Defendant:
Armen Azatian, Armen Azatian, CSP Los Angeles County and others
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Lee Brothers, II
The Blue Sky Fund, LLC v. Flores et al
as 8:2014cv01001
Defendant:
DOES and Natalia N Flores
Plaintiff:
The Blue Sky Fund, LLC
Lawrence Cyprian v. Derrick Givens, et al
as 12-17214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CYPRIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK GIVENS, P. ROGERS, K. PROVIDENCE and others
Michael N. Flores v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2011cv01280
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Michael N Flores
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
