Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Blue Line Foodservice Distribution, Inc. v. Cathcart et al
as 3:2024cv01250
Defendant:
Nerys Logistics, Inc., John Cathcart and Mercator Capital Advisors Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Line Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
LifeVoxel.AI Inc. et al v. Khan et al
as 3:2024cv01339
Defendant:
Adnad Shams, LifeVoxel Virginia SPV, LLC, Amjad M. Khan and others
Plaintiff:
LifeVoxel.AI Inc., Linh Le and Kovey Kovalan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Marquez v. Garland
as 24-4178
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MARIO NERI MARQUEZ
Tyrell Ainsworth v. Correctional Officer David Fores et al
as 2:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
Correctional Officer David Fores, Correctional Officer Peta, Correctional Officer Neri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neri Valdez v. Garland
as 24-3805
Petitioner:
EDGAR GIOVANNI NERI VALDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. One IA Potters House Church et al
as 2:2024cv04530
Defendant:
Plaza Inn, Liberty Barbershop, City of Naga and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roman v. O'Malley
as 24-3319
Plaintiff:
FELIPE NERY ROMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Portillo Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3291
Petitioner:
NERY ALEXANDER PORTILLO RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. One IA Potters House Church et al
as 2:2024cv04076
Defendant:
Celebrity Helicopters Inc., George Town, Penang, St. Philip Neri Catholic Church and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivas-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1622
Petitioner:
NERY OMAR RIVAS-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
