Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Briggs v. Baker
as 3:2020cv04243
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Briggs
Defendant:
Nie Julie, B. James, Arron Chapmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Tai Diep v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00171
Defendant:
DOES and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jack Nie Thy Diep, Tai Diep and H Yup Nie
Yiwei Chen et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service et al
as 2:2017cv06874
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Yiwei Chen, Song Hao, Yiling Ho and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bocker et al v. Deer Consumer Products Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Steven Bocker , Sadie LaBerge and Jay Wise
Defendant:
Deer Consumer Products Incorporated, Yuehua Xia, Zongshu Nie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Unilin Beheer B.V. et al v. NSL Trading Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02210
Defendant:
Chase Wood & Cabinets, Inc., Hui Chen, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Flooring Industries, Ltd. Sarl and Unilin Beheer B.V.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meggitt San Juan Capistrano, I v. Nie Yongzhong, et al
as 13-56843
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MEGGITT SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, INC., a Delaware corporaiton, DBA Meggit Sensing Systems
Defendant - Appellant:
NIE YONGZHONG, an individual, AKA Bill Nie, AKA William Nie and XIAMEN NIELL ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, a Chinese corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
